Kajian Teori Feminisme terhadap Legalisasi Aborsi dalam KUHP Nasional

Main Article Content

Cicin Nurpasha
Himah Aliya Hafidzoh
Mohamad Alvi Pratama

Abstract

Abortion is a complex and controversial issue in Indonesian society, especially when associated with women's reproductive rights and available legal protection. This study examines the legalization of abortion in Indonesia through a feminist theory approach as a tool to critique the patriarchal legal system. In Indonesian positive law, abortion is generally prohibited, but is permitted under certain conditions such as medical emergencies and pregnancy due to rape. Although there have been regulatory developments, such as through Law No. 36 of 2009, PP No. 61 of 2014, the National Criminal Code, and Law No. 17 of 2023, normative constraints such as gestational age limits, complex administrative procedures, and husband's permission requirements continue to limit women's autonomy over their bodies. This study uses a qualitative method with a juridical-normative approach and literature study of feminist regulations and theories. The results show that the Indonesian legal system still contains gender bias that hinders women's access to safe and legal abortion. Therefore, a more inclusive and human rights-based legal reform is needed to realize maximum protection for women's reproductive rights. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurpasha, C., Himah Aliya Hafidzoh, & Mohamad Alvi Pratama. (2025). Kajian Teori Feminisme terhadap Legalisasi Aborsi dalam KUHP Nasional. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 2(01). Retrieved from https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/praxis/article/view/951
Section
Articles

References

Arinahaten, M. A. (2021). Pertentangan Pemikiran Antara Gerakan Feminisme dan Anti-Feminisme di Indonesia. Kusa Lawa, 1(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.kusalawa.2021.001.02.08

Bartlett, K. T. (1987). MacKinnon’s Feminism: Power on Whose Term? California Law Review, 75, 1560–1570.

Chen, C.-J. (2013). Choosing the Right to Choose: Roe v. Wade and the Feminist Movement to Legalize Abortion in Martial-Law Taiwan. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2013.a530607

Dhara, A. (2022). Reversal of Roe v Wade. Canadian Family Physician, 68(10), 764–765. https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6810764

Ekotama, S., Pudjiarto, ST. H., & Widiartana. (2001). Abortus Provocatus Bagi Korban Perkosaan: Perspektif Viktimologi Kriminologi Dalam Hukum Pidana. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Fikri, A. (2024, April 4). Feminisme: Memahami Gerakan Perjuangan Perempuan Menurut Para Ahli. https://redasamudera.id/definisi-feminisme-menurut-para-ahli/

Haas, B. (2022, July 4). Charles Fourier: The Man Who Coined The Term “Feminism.” https://www.dw.com/en/charles-fourier-the-man-who-coined-the-term-feminism/a-61379159

Savira, V., & Novianto, W. T. (2014). Kritik Teori Hukum Feminis Terhadap Kebijakan Aborsi Pada Korban Perkosaan Di Indonesia. Recidive, 9(2), 512–513.

Sijabat, H. H., & Tridewiyanti, K. (2022). Feminism criticism of abortion provisions of rape victims according to law number 36 the year 2009 on health. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS5.2139

Soenarto, S. Y., Hakimi, M., Almirzanah, S., Darwito, Dewanto, A., Eddyono, S. W., Kusmaryanto, Sastrowijoto, S., Padmawati, R. S., Mahardinata, N. A., & Hartanti, W. (n.d.). Hukum Tindak Pidana Aborsi Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Symkowick, M. (2021). Reproductive Rights for Every Woman. https://sites.williams.edu/engl113-f18/symkowick/reproductive-rights-for-every-woman/#:~:text=Reproductive rights became one of,to safe and legal abortions.

Taber, B.-Z. (1979). Manual of Gynecologic and Obstetric Emergencies. Saunders.

Widowati. (2020). Tindakan Aborsi Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Dan Kesehatan di Indonesia. Jurnal Yustitiabelen, 6(2), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v6i2.243

Yanti, E. (2020). Kajian Yuridis Legalisasi Aborsi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(4), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss4.art6