Prinsip Rasionalistis Menurut Hugo Gratius Dalam Penerimaan Rohingya Di Aceh

Main Article Content

Rhenaldo Billy P
Kazziba Luthfi Akbar
Reva Berliana
Sheren Sesiola

Abstract

One of the events that is currently thought to threaten the security and resilience of the country is the arrival of the Rohingya to Indonesia, an event that has the potential to affect the security and resilience of the country. In dealing with these events, applying the principle of rationality can be an important basis for managing the related risks. Based on this description, the author finds two problems, namely (1) What is Hugo Gratius' view in his thoughts regarding rationalistic principles? and (2) What are the rationalistic principles according to Hugo Gratius in accepting the Rohingya in Aceh? The research specification used is descriptive analysis. The normative approach in legal research is focused on the normative juridical approach. The research stage involved the library research stage. And the analytical method used is qualitative juridical. The conclusion obtained is that Hugo Grotius's view of the principle of rationality is that this principle is the basis of objective morals and justice, and is the basis for understanding and following natural laws that apply universally. And the rationalistic principle according to Hugo Gratius in accepting Rohingya in Aceh is that it can be applied to consider human rights, humanity and justice in providing protection and assistance to those facing crisis or conflict situations to maintain the security and defense of one's own country so as to avoid social jealousy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rhenaldo Billy P, Kazziba Luthfi Akbar, Berliana, R., & Sheren Sesiola. (2024). Prinsip Rasionalistis Menurut Hugo Gratius Dalam Penerimaan Rohingya Di Aceh . Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(01). Retrieved from https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/praxis/article/view/541
Section
Articles

References

Ahmad Tafsir. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Rosda.

Amsal Bakhtiar. (2017). Filsafat Agama: Wisata Pemikiran dan Kepercayaan Manusia. Jakarta: RajaGraindo Persada.

Arliman Laurensius. (2018). Hukum Adat Di Indonesia Dalam Pandangan Para Ahli dan Konsep Pemberlakuannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Selat, 5(2), 181.

Aulia Rahmat. (2019). Rasionalisasi Hukum Alam oleh Hugo Grotius: Dari Humanisasi Menuju Sekularisasi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 435.

Bambang Mudjianto. (2014). Petunjuk Praktis Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.

Yogyakarta: Tiarana Lokus.

Hesti Puji Lestari. (2023). Selebgram India Beberkan Risiko jika Rohingya Masuk ke Indonesia. Retrieved from https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20231217/15/1724566/selebgram-india- beberkan-risiko-jika-rohingya-masuk-ke-indonesia

Hugo Grotius. (2012). Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Kinsella, H. M. (2006). Gendering Grotius: Sex and Sex Difference on Laws of

War. Political Theory, 34(2), 161.

Lorens Bagus. (2005). Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Marco Barducci. (2017). Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution 1613-1718: Transnational Reception in English Political Tought. New York: Oxford University Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

Rato, D. (2023). Pengaruh Teori Kant dalam Pengembangan Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum Universal. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 1(2), 34.

Ronny Hanitijo. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Shaver Robert. (1999). Grotius on Scepticism and Self-Interest. Brookfield:

Ashgate Publishing Company.

Silke-Petra Bergjan. (2009). Property, Piracy and Punishment: Hugo Grotius on War and Booty in de Iure Praedae - Concepts and Contexts. Leiden: Brill.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Syifa Rahmadina. (2023). Soal Pengungsi Rohingnya, Diterima atau Ditolak? Ini Kata Dosen UNAIR. Retrieved from https://unair.ac.id/soal-pengungsi- rohingnya-diterima-atau-ditolak-ini-kata-pakar-unair/