Peranan Hati Nurani Hakim dalam Persidangan
Main Article Content
Abstract
The judge is obliged to have a very good conscience in conducting a trial. For a judge, important facts or events, not the law, when deciding a case that is certain will determine an event. This research was conducted to examine the conscience of a judge when carrying out a trial, along with the factor of conscience not working so that it does not cause a violation by not applying conscience and to find out how the profession of a judge is. This study uses a normative juridical method which is a method that uses legal material sources in the form of laws and regulations, legal theory, decrees and court decisions and uses literature study techniques, namely collecting data sourced from libraries, such as books and documents official documents from the government. then in the results of this study is Significantly there are causal factors that influence the popularity of a judge. One of the conditions for becoming a professional is to have faith in God Almighty, namely by carrying out His commands and avoiding His prohibitions. Loyalty to God Almighty, the Code of Ethics for Judges is regulated in the Decree of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Chair of the Commission of the Republic of Indonesia and Chair of the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 047/KMA/SKB/IV/2009/02/SKB/P.KY/V /2009.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Angkouw, K. (2014). Fungsi Mahkamah Agung Sebagai Pengawas Internal Tugas Hakim Dalam Proses Peradilan. Lex Administratum, 2(2), 131–140.
Annisa, N. F. (2017). Lex et Societatis , Vol. V/No. 3/Mei/2017. V(3), 157–166.
Arianto, H. (2012). PERANAN HAKIM DALAM UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. 151–163.
Dewi, A. P. (2022). Putusan Hakim vs Hati Nurani. 2022/02/22 at 9:38 PM. https://kawanhukum.id/putusan-hakim-vs-hati-nurani/
Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi. In ALFABETA, cv.
Legoh, A. (2001). Satu Teologi Tentang Hati Nurani. Jiu, 4(1), 28–35.
MA. (2009). Ketua Komisi Yudisial Ri Nomor : 047 / Kma / Skb / Iv / 2009 Tentang. 047/Kma/Skb/Iv/2009, 6–20.
Monteiro, J. M. (2007). 13095-ID-putusan-hakim-dalam-penegakan-hukum-di-indonesia.pdf. 25 No 2.
Savitri, N. (2007). Tugas Hakim dan Penafsiran atas KUHP. In Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia (Vol. 25, p. 343).
Sinaga, A. N. (2020). Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460
Sudirman, A. (2007). Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya. Suatu Pendekatan dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurisprudence) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar. xxi, 258 hal.
Suparyanto & Rosad, 2015. (2020). Putusan Hakim dalam Keadilan. In Suparyanto dan Rosad (Vol. 5, Issue 3).
Tajudin, alben. (2017). Berhukum dengan Hati Nurani. 21 Agustus. https://www.kompasiana.com/amp/albentajudin/599a8820b7c38912401b9f12/berhukum-dengan-hati-nurani
Tasidjawa, Y. (2015). Lex Administratum, Vol. III/No. 6/Ags/2015. III(6), 157–165.
Tawon, A. (2020). Pedoman Perilaku Hakim. Pengadilan Agama Bima. https://www.pa-bima.go.id/peraturan/kode-etik/kode-etik-perilaku-hakim.html