Proses Penangguhan Penahanan Dengan Jaminan Berdasarkan Pasal 31 KUHAP
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Law is not just a guide to read and know, but to be implemented and obeyed. Regulations are rules that regulate and force people to obey and obey them, as a result of which the equilibrium of every interaction with the people can be achieved. The purpose of this study is to analyze the conditions and mechanisms that must be met by the applicant so that a suspension of detention can be carried out and the basis for consideration for investigators to suspend detention using bail. This study uses a normative method in legislation, regulatory theory and scholarly opinions. From this research it was found that the requirements and mechanisms that must be met by the applicant in order to be able to do a detention suspension and constitute mandatory detention are determined by the Police agency that delays detention on the basis of consideration for investigators to suspend detention using guarantees is the implementation of Article 31 paragraph (1) of Law no. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).
Downloads
Article Details
References
Andi Sefullah, A. M. F. & M. F. S. (2020). Kalabbirang Law Journal. Kesiapan Menikah, 2(April), 14–21.
AULIANI, N. (2017). kajian yuridis terhadap penangguhan penahanan dengan jaminan uang berdasarkan passal 31kuhp. 5(7)(1), 59–67.
Berutu, E. S. (2017). Penangkapan Dan Penahanan Tersangka Menurut Kuhap Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Lex Crimen, 6(6), 87.
C.S.T.Kansil. (2007). pokok-pokok hukum pidana. Gramedia.
HAFID NURZAMAN. (2018). implementasi pasal 31 KUHP tentang penangguhan penahanan dengan atau tanpa jaminan. Jurnal Hukum, 1(11150331000034), 1–147.
Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Harahap, M. Y. (1998). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Pustaka Kartini, Jakarta.
I Made Arya Kusuma Winata, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2021). Proses Penangguhan Penahanan Dengan Jaminan Pada Tingkat Penyidik Berdasarkan Pasal 31 Kuhap. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(2), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3449.403-408
Ii, B. A. B., & Jelas, A. Y. (n.d.). Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2002, hal. 16. Ibid. 11. 4, 11–31.
Khambali, M. (2019). Penangguhan Penahanan Dengan Jaminan Dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 6(6), 44–54.
Kitab, P. B., Pidana, U. H. A., Muhammad, O., & Giraldo, A. (2020). kedudukan penyidik dalam prapenuntutan berdasarkan kitab undang-undang hukum acara pidana (KUHP). LEX CRIMEN, IX(4), 109–117.
Nurdin, N., Hafidz, M., & Badaru, B. (2020). Jaminan Penangguhan Penahanan Pada Tahap Penyidikan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v1i2.273
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM PROSES PENAHANAN ORANG. (2014). JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v3i2.90
Permenhub. (2013). pembebasan bersyarat. Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 69(1496), 1–13.
Susanto, A. F. (2015). Penelitian hukum: transformatif-partisipatoris.
Tantiono, E. P., & Soeskandi, H. (2017). JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI TERSANGKA DALAM SYARAT-SYARAT PENAHANAN. Mimbar Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2199
Wahyuni, D. F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. In Perpustakaan Nasional.