Upaya Transformasi Metode Berpikir Pendidikan Dengan Menggunakan Epistemologi Induktivisme Yang Dikemukakan Oleh Francis Bacon
Main Article Content
Abstract
Human life in today's modern era has been helped a lot by the results of scientific discoveries or knowledge and education. Likewise, humans can know many things and utilize the natural products around them, whether in the form of inanimate objects, animals or plants, to help human survival, which does not escape the role of scientific progress. The aim of this research is to find out how Francis Bacon's inductivist epistemology is an effort to re-transform thinking methods in education. The method in this research uses library research, namely a method of collecting data by understanding and studying theories from various literature related to the research. The results of this research are that the fields of science and education have benefited greatly from Frances Bacon's contributions. He was the pioneer and the main reason why the Renaissance occurred in Europe. The father of modern philosophy, as some people call him. He has made many scientific breakthroughs. The evolution of the epistemology of science is strongly influenced by beliefs and views. Bacon's opinions can be considered practical, useful, and true in general. Empiricism, according to Bacon, relies on the method of induction. However, he did not invent the method in its entirety; instead, he sought to perfect it by combining traditionalist methods of induction with methodical experimentation, in-depth observation, and systematizing the scientific process to produce real and useful scientific truths. logically, and ultimately able to provide benefits from nature to humans, with various useful scientific discoveries, although in reality all of Bacon's epistemological theories contain some risks. In real life, we must constantly consider each other's scientific beliefs while recognizing their underlying importance. Dynamic and harmonious scientific dynamics will result from this effort.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. 2022. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974-980.
Baggini, Julian. 2002. Lima Tema Utama Filsafat; Pengetahuan, Filsafat Moral, Filsafat Agama, Filsafat Pikiran, dan Filsafat Politi, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Ewing. 2002. Persoalan-persoalan Mendasar Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Heriyanto, Husain. 2003. Paradigma Holistik; Dialog Filsafat, Sains dan Kehidupan Menurut Shadra dan Whitehead, Jakarta: TERAJU.
Ladyman, James. 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.
Laer, Henry Van. 1995. Filsafat Ilmu: Ilmu Pengetahuan Secara Umum. Yogyakarta: LPMI.
Mahdi, Adnan. 2009. Topik-Topik Epistemologi Tentang Induktivisme F. Bacon, Rasionalisme R. Descartes, Dan Sintesisme, Empirisisme Serta Rasionalisme Kant. http://stai-sambas.blogspot.com/2009/10/topik-topik-epistemologi-tentang.html . Diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2024.
Putri, Riski Amalia. 2009. Problema Induksi dan Ketergantungan Observasi pada Teori. http://blog.unsri.ac.id/riski02/filsafat-ilmu-/induktivisme-problema-induksi-dan-ketergantungan-obsevasi-pada-teori-/mrdetail/14742/ . Diakses tanggal 2 oktober 2010.
Rapar, Jan Hendrik. 1996. Pengantar Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Smith, Samuel. 1990. Gagasan-gagasan Tokoh-tokoh Dalam Bidang Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suparlan, Suhartono. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.
Suriasumantri, Jujun S. 2003. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Verhaak, C. dan R. Haryono Imam. 1997. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pusaka Utama.