Teori Penegakan Hukum Menurut Friedman Terkait Persoalan Penggunaan Narkotika Untuk Kepentingan Medis Relevansi Dengan Pertimbangan Moral Dan Hukum
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The problem in this journal is that the author believes that the punishment given to Fidelis Ari, Fidelis Ari's wife died, because the illness suffered by his wife could not be treated with ordinary medical treatment, which was not in accordance with law enforcement factors according to Friedman M Lawrance. Based on this description, the author aims to study and understand Friedman M Lawrance's views on law enforcement and to study and understand Friedman M Lawrance's views on law enforcement in fighting criminal acts of using narcotics for medical purposes.This research is in the form of descriptive analysis which will only describe the condition of the object or problem being studied. In this legal research, the approach method used is a philosophical approach. The research stage carried out includes the library research stage. And this research will use qualitative juridical research methods according to the problems that are the focus of the research.The results of the research show that Fidelis was a case of using narcotics for medical purposes for his wife's recovery, so that Fidelis violated Articles 111 and 116 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Friedman M Lawrance's view regarding law enforcement in combating the criminal act of using narcotics for medical purposes is not in accordance with the provisions or substance of other provisions which can reduce the punishment for perpetrators as stipulated in Article 48 of the Criminal Code which states that anyone who commits an act due to the influence of coercive power, does not convicted
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Achmad Ali. (2012). Keterpurukan Hukum Di Indonesia (Penyebab dan Solusinya). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Bambang Mudjianto. (2014). Petunjuk Praktis Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Tiarana Lokus.
Barda Nawawi. (2001). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Faisal, M. A., & Ali Firmansyah, C. Z. (2009). Pengenaan Pidana Penggunaan Narkotika Golongan 1 Jenis Ganja Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun. Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, 2(5), 549. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v6i2.22250
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
H.R. Otje Salman dan Anton F. Susanto. (2004). Teori Hukum: Mengingat, Mengumpulkan, dan Membuka Kembali. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Imam Sukadi. (2011). Matinya Hukum Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia (The Powerless of Law in the Process of Law Enforcement in Indonesia). Risalah Hukum, 7(1), 40.
Koropit, R. K. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Rehabilitasi Bagi Pengguna Narkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Lex Et Societatis, 8(5), 55.
Marzuki, P. M. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
Rahaditya, K. A. P. & R. (2019). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Penggunaan Narkotika Golongan 1 (satu) Jenis Ganja untuk Kesehatan. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 2(Volume 2 Nomor 2, Desember 2019).
Rahardjo, S. (1995). Masalah Penegakan Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Thomas Wira Dharma Simanjuntak. (2022). Hubungan Penegakan Hukum Undang-Undang Narkotika Di Indonesia Dengan Over Kapasitas Di Lapas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(6), 1148.
Toni Pransiska. (2017). Meneropong Wajah Studi Islam dalam Kacamata Filsafat: Sebuah Pendekatan Alternatif. Intizar, 23(1), 180.
Zainab Ompu Jainah. (2011). Membangun Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Penegak Hukum Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Tentang Lahirnya Badan Narkotika Nasional). Keadilan Progresif, 2(2), 124.