Independensi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Uu Yang Memuat Conflict Of Interest Pada Putusan Mk No 90/Puu-Xxi/2023
Main Article Content
Abstract
Independence for judicial power is one of the principles that must be adhered to, especially in countries based on law. A state based on law must guarantee the implementation of the power of an independent judiciary, free from any interference from extrajudicial powers to organize the administration of justice to uphold order, justice, truth and legal certainty that is able to provide protection to the community. The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 90 / PUU-XXI / 2023 concerning the additional experience of serving from electoral election in the minimum age requirement for presidential / vice presidential candidates has generated a number of controversies from various circles. Material testing of Law No. 7 of 2017 contains a conflict of interest with one of the Constitutional Court judges, namely the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court Anwar Usman. In this case, of course, there is the independence of judges that needs to be studied in the Constitutional Court Decision. For this reason, the author conducts this research with the aim of examining and discussing more deeply the code of ethics related to the independence of constitutional judges in cases of judicial review of laws containing conflicts of interest, especially in Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. In addition, this study also aims to analyze the legal consequences for Constitutional Court judges who violate the code of ethics. The research method used in this research is qualitative research with a juridical-normative approach, which is a research that emphasizes normative legal science, but also tries to examine the rules that apply in society. The result of this study is the application of the independence of Constitutional Court judges in Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 can be questioned considering the considerations that the author has described and for this reason, the legal consequences for Constitutional Court judges who violate the Code of Ethics can vary. As for what can be the legal consequences if a Constitutional Court judge violates the Code of Ethics is internal discipline, temporary suspension to law enforcement.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Ahsin Thohari. (2004). Komisi Yudisial dan Reformasi Peradilan. Jakarta: ELSAM
Achmad Edi Subiyanto, Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol 9 Nomor 4 Desember 2012
Ahmad Kamil. (2012). Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Andi Suherman, “Implementasi Independensi Hakim Dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman”, SIGn Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1, September 2019
Barhamudin, Kemandirian Hakim Dalam Perspektif Negarawan, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Palembang, Vol. 17 Nomor 3 September 2019
Desti Fadhilla Zahra, Peradilan Konstitusi Dalam Sejarah, Perkembangan, dan Urgensinya Di Indonesia, Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional, Vol. 1, Nomor 3 tahun 2022
Giovanni Sartori, The Theory of Democracy Revisited, New Jersey: Chatham House, 1987
Janpatar Simamora, "Analisis Yuridis terhadap Model Kewenangan Judicial Review Indonesia"', Jamal Mimbar Hakam, Volume 25 , Nomor 3, Oktober 2013.
Jazim Hamidi, Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan ImplikasiHukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Konstitusi Press & Citra Media, Yogyakarta, 2006
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005).
Jimly Asshddiqie. Model-Model Penguiian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara.
Leonardo, W, Levy (ed), Judicial Review: Sejarah Kelahiran, Wewenang dan Fungsinya dalam Negara Demokrasi, Judul asli Judicial Review and the Supreme Court, Penerjemah Eni Purwaningsih, (Jakarta: Penerbit Nuansa, 2005)
Nurul Qamar, Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 1, No. 1 November 2012
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Cetak Biru Membangun Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Institusi peradilan Konstitusi yang Modern dan Terpercaya, (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2004)