Penerapan Etika Dan Transparansi Notaris Dalam Akta Otentik

Main Article Content

Sahla Billah Sahira
Debriana Novianti
Devany Putri Prasetia

Abstract

Notarial practice is an important part of the legal system that facilitates legal agreements and property transactions. Ethics and transparency are two key elements in maintaining the integrity and trust of the public in notary services. This article discusses the application of ethics and transparency in notary practice.


Ethics in notary practice includes moral and professional principles that notaries must adhere to in every aspect of their work. This includes the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of client information, avoid conflicts of interest, and provide objective legal advice. The application of this ethics is important to maintain public trust in Notaries and the legal system as a whole.


Transparency is another important principle in notarial practice. This involves providing clear and complete information to all parties involved in a legal transaction. The notary must provide an easy-to-understand explanation of the legal process, costs incurred, as well as the rights and obligations of the parties to the transaction.


The application of ethics and transparency in notary practice has a significant positive impact. This helps prevent fraud and abuse of the law, maintains public trust in Notaries, and provides protection to parties involved in legal transactions. Apart from that, this also ensures that notaries carry out their role as guardians of legal order as well as possible.


However, there are still challenges in implementing ethics and transparency in notarial practices. Notaries have to deal with complex situations and sometimes external pressures that can compromise their integrity. Therefore, continuous education and training regarding ethics and transparency is very necessary so that Notaries can carry out their duties with full integrity and professionalism.


In conclusion, the application of ethics and transparency in notary practice is an important element in maintaining public trust in the legal system. Notaries have a moral and professional responsibility to carry out their work with full integrity and provide clear information to all parties involved in legal transactions. Thus, Notaries can play an important role in maintaining justice and public trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sahira, S. B., Debriana Novianti, & Devany Putri Prasetia. (2024). Penerapan Etika Dan Transparansi Notaris Dalam Akta Otentik. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(02). Retrieved from https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/429
Section
Articles

References

Habib Adjie, 2011, Merajut Pemikiran dalam dunia notaris dan PPAT, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,

Adjie, Habib, 2008, Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Tafsir Tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. “Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Ingkar Notaris.” Jurnal Perspektif XVII No. 3 (2012).

Dyani, Vina Akfa. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Membuat Party Acte” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 2, No. 1 (2017).

Faisal, “Akibat Hukum Ketiadaan Akta Ikrar Wakaf Atas Perwakafan Tanah.” De Lega Lata Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Umsu 3, No. 2 (2018).

Herlien Budiono, 2010, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan,CitraAditya Bakti, Bandung.

Kelsen, Hans, 2006. Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara, Penerjemah Raisul Muttaqien, Bandung: Nusamedia dan Nuansa.

Kusumaningdiah, Erlina. “Ketidaksinkronan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Mengenai Kewajiban Ingkar Notaris.” Jurnal Repertorium IV No. 2 (2017).

Prasetya Agung Laksana, Batas-Batas Kewajiban Menjaga Kerahasiaan Notaris Dalam Kaitannya Hak Ingkar Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Jurnal Akta 3, No. 4 (2016).

Pramono, Dedy. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris:Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica 12, No 3, (2015).

Putra, I Kadek Agus Satria Darma. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Pembuatan Minuta Akta Akibat Penyalahgunaan Keharasiaan Minuta Akta Oleh Mantan Pekerjanya.” Jurnal Indonesian Notary 3 No. 2 (2021).

Sari, Indah. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal I lmiah Hukum Dirgantara 11 No.1 (2020).

Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, 2011, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung

Tan Thong Kie, 2007, Study Notariat & Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris, Ichtiar Baru VanHoeve, Jakarta. Refika Aditama, Bandung,

______, 2007, Teori Hukum Murni, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, Bandung: Nusamedia dan Nuansa.

______, 2008, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Normatif, Prinsip-Prinsip Teoritis untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan dalam Hukum dan Politik, Penerjemah Nurulita Yusron, Bandung: Nusamedia.

M. Nurung, 2006, Notaris Tidak Tepat Dijadikan Saksi Hukum Perdata, Majalah Renvoi 12 Edisi Mei.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 20014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris

Kode Etik Notaris Ikatan Notaris Indonesia ( INI)

Majalah Renvoi, Majalah berita Bulanan Notaris, PPAT & Hukum, “ Notaris Kemplang Notaris”, Nomor 9.57.V, Oktober 2023 http:// www.notariatnews.com.