Etika Profesi Jaksa Terhadap Kode Etik Jaksa Pada Kasus Suap Eks Jaksa Di Bengkulu

Abstract

The phenomenon of violations of the prosecutor's code of ethics that often occurs is that prosecutors are legal defenders and as a profession are free, independent and responsible in enforcing the laws guaranteed by law. This means that prosecutors have rights, obligations and responsibilities in accordance with statutory regulations. The implementation of cases is not well known to the general public because the focus is always on how the court decides on punishment without seeing that there are ethical sanctions given in addition to existing court decisions. This shows that the enforcement provided by the government is related to law enforcement regulated by The law is a responsibility that must be obeyed by existing prosecutors so that law enforcement can run well and correctly. Therefore, in this research we focus on relevant applications between cases of prosecutors who violate Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning Indonesian prosecutors to make it easier. in looking at what kind of ethical sanctions are given to existing violators, because this can raise questions about how the attorney general, deputy attorney general, and junior attorney general impose sanctions in accordance with Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning Indonesian prosecutors on former prosecutors who are considered relevant to the law that applies to him, this has an influence on the punishment of the deputy attorney general, deputy attorney general, and junior attorney general in determining sanctions relating to the former prosecutor in accordance with Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia so that there is certainty of ethical sanctions or a code of ethics. in the prosecutor's office, so that there is no arbitrariness carried out by irresponsible former prosecutors in holding their positions as law enforcers.