Malpraktik Medis Menurut Kode Etik Tenaga Kesehatan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to find out and understand the actions of health workers who commit negligence or errors in medical services which are often referred to as malpractice. The type of research used in this research is Normative Ethics with a descriptive qualitative approach method. The existence of claims regarding the negligence of health workers from patients is something that is actually avoided and even feared because it involves the good name and credibility of a profession that has long been considered noble in saving people's lives. Initiating activities that are below standard or even above standard to avoid the risk of prosecution. In addition, the equal relationship between doctor and patient is a medical contract that is naturally and unfavorably disturbed due to suspicions from both parties regarding the delivery of information related to medical procedures carried out by Health Workers, the incompatibility of medical actions carried out by Health Workers with what is stated. in a medical agreement contract, or even actions that violate Standard Operating Procedures, causing harm to the Patient. The existence of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council as an institution that has the authority to follow up and provide sanctions regarding alleged errors committed by doctors and dentists in applying their knowledge. With the presence of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council, anyone can complain if their interests are harmed by the actions of a doctor or dentist in carrying out medical practice.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Holijah, Lenny Y, Aldino A, Sulaida, Dewi S, Sigit Rahmat. (2023). Etika Antar Tenaga Medis Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Kesehatan. Vol 4 (2). Hal 133.
Pelafu Julius. (2015). Pelaksanaan Penegakan Kode Etik Kedokteran. Vol 4 (3). Hal 47.
Tsanie, Maria Latifa. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Risiko Medis Terhadap Persetujuan Dokter Kepada Pasien Atas Tindakan Medis. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora (Vol. 1, No. 1), Hal 148-165.
Sarguna, B. S. (2004). Quality Assurance Pelayanan Rumah Sakit. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: Konsorsium Rumah Sakit Islam Jateng-DIY.
Farizky, Kevin Aura., Nurzaman, Randi Hilman., Permadi, Shira Carmela., Noorhaliza, Andi Kavenya. (2023). Etika Dan Moral Tenaga Kesehatan. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, Hal 1-25.
Supriyatin, Ukilah. (2018). Aspek Hukum Dalam Penyelenggaraan Praktik Kedokteran Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Jurnal (Vol. 1), Hal 117-124.
Muh. Saleh S., Hasmin., Feral, Eddyman W. (2018). Pengaruh Ekspektasi, Persepsi, Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit Bhayangkara Makassar. Jurnal Mirai Management (Vol. 3, No. 1), Hal 1-15.
Mohammad Alvi Pratama., Ahnav Bil Aufaq., Rr. Yudiswara Ayu Permatasari. (2022). Optimalisi Paradigma Informed Consent dari to Disclose Menuju to Understand Sebagai Penghormatan Individual Autonomy. Jurnal Penelitian Keseharan Suara Forikes. (Vol. 13, No. 4) Hal 1011-1016
Purnama, S.G. (2017) Modul Etika Dan Hukum Kesehatan Universitas Udayana. Euthanasia, September, 83.
Nugrianti Khairunnisa, Ratna H, Sekar A. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Tugas Dan Wewenang Majelis Kehormatan Displin Kedokteran IndonesiaI. Vol 6 (2). Hal 5.
Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia Nomor 14/P/MKDKI/IV/2019 Tahun 2019.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 63/Pdt.G/2021 Tahun 2021.