Hukum dalam Narasi Tradisi: Studi Sosiologi Hukum atas Pendekatan Kultural Dedi Mulyadi dalam Reformasi Birokrasi Lokal
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the cultural approach employed by Dedi Mulyadi in the process of local bureaucratic reform in Purwakarta Regency from the perspective of sociology of law. As a regent known for his leadership style rich in Sundanese traditional values, Dedi Mulyadi utilized local cultural elements not merely as symbols, but as instruments for social transformation and bureaucratic reform. The study is grounded in Roscoe Pound’s theory of law as a tool of social engineering, which perceives law not only as written norms but also as an integral part of social and cultural dynamics. Through a qualitative approach and descriptive analysis, the study finds that local traditional symbols and practices such as the use of traditional attire, the arrangement of public spaces based on local wisdom, and cultural narratives in public communication successfully fostered proximity between the government and the people, while enhancing bureaucratic effectiveness. However, this approach also faces challenges, particularly regarding the politicization of culture and resistance to modernization. The findings highlight the significance of integrating positive legal norms with local values in the process of renewing governance toward a more participatory and civilized public administration.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Hakim, A. (2023). Navigating Legal Pluralism: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis of Governance and Law in Multicultural Societies. https://doi.org/10.61963/jkt.v1i2.35
Biryukov, S. (2024). Legal Pluralism As an Ideology and a Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 28(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.61205/s160565900029629-5
Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, Culture And Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/516354035.pdf
Dębska, H. (2015). Law’s Symbolic Power: Beyond the Marxist Conception of Ideology. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics, 5(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/WRLAE-2015-0020
Hoekema, A. J. (2017). The conundrum of cross-cultural understanding in the practice of law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1310446
Li, X. (2024). Legal Pluralism. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199796953-0258
Přibáň, J. (2016). On Legal Symbolism in Symbolic Legislation: A Systems Theoretical Perspective (pp. 105–121). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6_7
Swartz, D. L. (2013). Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. https://www.amazon.com/Symbolic-Power-Politics- Intellectuals-Political/dp/0226925013
Swenson, G. (2018). Legal pluralism in theory and practice. International Studies Review, 20(3), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ISR/VIX060
Yunus, R., & Tamma, S. (2014). Importance of Cultural Legitimacy to the Local Government in Indonesian Democracy. 21(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.20476/JBB.V21I1.4041
Hoekema, A. J. (2017). The conundrum of cross-cultural understanding in the practice of law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1310446