STUDI KRITIS KEPUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP RUU PILKADA DARI PANDANGAN SILA KE -5

Main Article Content

Patricia Amanda
Prita Laura Lee
Leonardus Lewis
Ero Raka Widia Sena

Abstract

This study discusses the Constitutional Court's decision on the Regional Election Bill according to the 5th principle. This research was conducted with the aim of finding out more about the decision of the constitutional court and the Regional Election Bill according to the perspective of the 5th principle (Justice for all Indonesian people). In this research; The researcher chose to use qualitative theory. This research discusses in more depth the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the Regional Election Bill according to the 5th principle, such as the background to the Constitutional Court's decision; The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution (The Guardian of the Constitution) and also as the guardian of democracy; the Constitutional Court's decision on the Regional Election Bill; Details regarding the Pilkada timeline, Constitutional Court Decisions, House of Representatives Sessions; Controversy related to the Constitutional Court's decision on the Regional Election Bill; Various opinions regarding the Constitutional Court Decision and the Regional Election Bill; and Reasons for the rejection of the revision of the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the Regional Election Bill by the people, teachers and experts.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amanda, P., Prita Laura Lee, Leonardus Lewis, & Ero Raka Widia Sena. (2024). STUDI KRITIS KEPUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP RUU PILKADA DARI PANDANGAN SILA KE -5. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 3(01). Retrieved from https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/788
Section
Articles

References

nnti