Konsep Retributive Justice Dalam Perspektif Jeremy Bentham Relevansinya Terkait Pemenuhan Hak Bagi Korban Kekerasan Seksual
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research problem in this journal is that retributive justice rarely receives attention in providing rights to victims of criminal acts of sexual violence. Legal defenders only focus on how to enforce sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts of sexual violence, without paying attention to the rights of victims as stipulated in Article 5 of Law Number 31 of 2014. The aim of the research in this journal is to study and analyze the concept of retributive justice in Jeremy Bentham's perspective, its relevance is related to providing rights for victims of sexual violence and to studying and analyzing the legal consequences if retributive justice in Jeremy Bentham's perspective cannot be applied in providing rights for victims of sexual violence.
The research method, namely in the form of research specifications used by the author, is descriptive analysis, while the approach method used by the author is normative juridical. The research stage carried out by the author was the library stage which consisted of primary, secondary and tertiary materials, then the field stage. The analytical method used by the author is qualitative juridical.
The results of the research show that retributive justice in Jeremy Bentham's perspective is relevant in relation to the rights of victims of sexual violence, namely the emphasis on punishment commensurate with the crime committed so that retributive justice guarantees that victims of sexual violence have adequate access to justice, protection and support. The legal consequences if retributive justice in Jeremy Bentham's perspective cannot be applied in containing the rights of victims of sexual violence are a lack of justice, reduced community response, no deterrent effect, lack of recovery, and distrust of the justice system.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Dahlan. (2017). Problematika Keadilan Dalam Penerapan Pidana Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Dan Markel and Chad Flanders. (2010). Bentham on Stilts: The Bare Relevance of Subjectivity to Retributive Justice. California Law Review, 98(907), 909.
Dominikus Rato. (2010). Filsafat Hukum, Mencari, Menemukan, Dan Memahami Hukum. Surabaya: LaksBang Yustisia.
Effendi, J. (2015). Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Frederikus Fios. (2012). Keadilan Hukum Jeremy Bentham Dan Relevansinya Bagi Praktik Hukum Kontemporer. Humaniora, 3(1), 301.
Jazim Hamidi. (2016). Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan ImplikasiHukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI. Yogyakarta: Konstitusi Press & Citra Media.
Jeremy Bentham. (2010). The Rationale Of Punishment (1830). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Marwan Mas. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Moeleong, L. J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rosdakarya.
Nasution, D. R. (2019). Berita Megapolitan Peristiwa Terbaru Hari Ini. Retrieved November 6, 2022, from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/
Nurbani, S. H. dan E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: PT Kompas Gramedia Nusantara.
Salman Luthan. (2015). Dialektika Hukum dan Moral dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 19(4), 506.
Satjipto Rahardjo. (2012). Budaya Hukum Hakim. Jakarta: Kharisma Putra Utama.
Soedjono Dirdjosisworo. (2010). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Subhan Amin. (2019). Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat. El-Afkar, 8(1), 1.
Sukarno Aburaera. (2010). Filsafat Hukum. Makasar: Pustaka Refleksi.
Tony Draper. (2002). An Introduction to Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Punishment. Journal of Bentham Studies, 5, 10.