Pengaruh Aliran Filsafat Utilitarianisme Dan Realisme Terhadap Perkembangan Hukum Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of law in Indonesia cannot be separated from the influence of several main legal philosophical schools, in this case utilitarianism and realism. Utilitarianism focuses on shared happiness and the welfare of society, seen in legal policies aimed at improving social welfare. Meanwhile, realism recognizes the role of social, economic and political factors in shaping law, reflected in responses to social issues.
The aim of this research is to look at the influence of the philosophical schools of utilitarianism and legal realism in the phenomenon of the development of legal science in Indonesia. This research method is a qualitative method with a descriptive analysis approach. This type of research is a literature study sourced from primary and secondary sources. The results of this research are that realism is a school of legal philosophy which holds that law is a product of society and power, where this school emphasizes the reality and practice of law. Second, the flow of utilitarianism influences the fields of law enforcement, punishment systems, legal policies, and social and economic policies and in making these regulations looks more and focuses on the benefits of a rule for the benefit of society itself, while realism influences the process of forming the law itself, which there are court decisions that are used as a source of law that adapt to the development of society. The conclusion obtained from this research is that the development of law in Indonesia is influenced by legal philosophical thinking, where the flow of legal philosophy of utilitarianism and realism does not have too much influence because there are other schools that influence the development of Indonesian law, both in the punishment system, legal policy, law making. -invitations, the form of law itself, whether written law or unwritten law, however, both of these ideas are really needed in Indonesia, which is currently still dominated by positivist thinking.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Aburaera, S., Muhadar, & Maskun. (2013). Filsafat Hukum Teori dan Praktik. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Aprita, S., & Adhitya, R. (2020). Filsafat Hukum (1 ed.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Bagenda, C. (2022). Filsafat Realisme Hukum Dalam Perspektif Ontologi, Aksiologi, Dan Epistemologi. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4777
Budiono, A., & Vivid Izziyana, W. (2018). THEISTIC LEGAL REALISM (Suatu Pilihan Radikal bagi Pengembangan Hukum). Hukum Ransedental: Pengembangan dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, 367–383.
Latipulhayat, A. (2015). Khazanah Jeremy Bentham. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 413–425.
Malik, F. (2021). Tinjauan Terhadap Teori Positivisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 188–196. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/31488
Masyarah, A. (2017). Perubahan Dan Perkembangan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Warta Edisi : 52, April, 1–14.
Nadir, & Yuli Wardani, W. (2019). Percikan Pemikiran Tiga Aliran Hukum: Sejarah Hukum, Sociological Jurisprudence, dan Legal Realisme Dalam Khasanah Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Yustitia, 20(1), 42–50.
Pranowo, Y. (2020). Prinsip Utilitarisme sebagai Dasar Hidup Bermasyarakat. Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Budaya, 26(2), 172–178.
Pratiwi, E., Negoro, T., & Haykal, H. (2022). Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum? Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 268.
Rahmatullah, I. (2021). Filsafat Realisme Hukum; Konsep dan Aktualisasinya dalam Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. Adalah: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i3.21395
Saepullah, A. (2020). Konsep Utilitarianisme John Stuart Mill: Relevansinya terhadap Ilmu-ilmu atau Pemikiran Keislaman. In Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam (Vol. 11, Nomor 2). https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/jmieb/article/view/3384.
Septiansyah, Z. B., & Ghalib, M. (2018). Konsepsi Utilitarianisme dalam Filsafat Hukum dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 34(1), 27–34. https://mises.org/library/jeremy-
Khan, A. (2023). American Legal Realism and the Revitalization of Literary Realist History. American Literary Realism, 55(3), 248-260.
Bentham, J., & Mill, J. S. (2004). Utilitarianism and other essays. Penguin UK.
Gilmore, G. (1961). Legal realism: Its cause and cure. The Yale Law Journal, 70(7), 1037-1048.
Aviva, F. N. (2023). Pengaruh Teori Positivisme Hukum dan Teori Utilitarianisme Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Relasi Publik, 1(4), 111-123
di Era Posmodernisme, H. Realisme Hukum Skandinavia: Hukum dalam Kerangka Psiko-Fisis. Memahami Teori Hukum: Percikan Pemikiran Ilmu Hukum Lintas Mazhab, 129.