Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Ringan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Restorative Justice restores relationships and makes amends that the perpetrator of the crime (his family) wants to make to the victim of the crime (his family) outside the court (peaceful efforts), so that the legal problems arising from the crime can be resolved properly based on the agreement of the parties. The existence of Restorative Justice (RJ) in Indonesia can change all problems in all aspects of criminal law such as justice and other matters. Restorative Justice seeks to resolve a crime by emphasizing the recovery of losses experienced by victims, perpetrators, and the community affected by the crime. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of restorative justice as a quick settlement of minor crimes. This research uses a qualitative method with a juridical-normative approach. The type of research in this writing is a literature study with descriptive analytical analysis because it is carried out by collecting various data related to the research, then the data is presented descriptively (exposure) and analyzed in accordance with related laws and related theories. This research uses primary legal materials derived from laws and regulations and also secondary materials derived from books and legal journals relevant to the discussion. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of Restotative Justice is still not optimal. Based on Decree No. 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 issued by the Director General of General Courts dated December 20, 2020 Guidelines for the Implementation of Justice Aiming to Restore Fair Conditions as a Guideline for Judges in the general judicial environment in handling cases using a restorative justice approach. This technical guidance is expected to contribute to optimizing the implementation of restorative justice, so that it is no longer focused on punishment.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adiesta, I. D. I. 2021. Penerapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Inovasi Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Ringan. Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 143-170.
Ds. Dewi, Restorative Justice, Diversionary Schemes And Special Children’s Courts In Indonesia. https://www.kemlu.go.id/ . Diakses pada tanggal 5 Mei 2023.
Emirzon, J. (2022). Alternatif Penyelesaian sengketa di Luar pengadilan.
Keputusan Dirjen Badan Peradilan Umum MA RI No. 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 tentang Pemberlakuan Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) pada 22 Desember 2020.
Mahendra, A. P. (2020). Mediasi Penal Pada Tahap Penyidikan Berlandaskan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1153
Manullang, H., Sitanggang, R., Sidauruk, S., & Sinaga, E. (2020). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Biasa Bermotif Ringan dengan Restoratif Justice Sebagian Bentuk Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Magister Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Vol.1(1), 5–24
Marian Liebmann, Restorative Justice, How it Work, (London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2007), 25.
Mudzakkir, "Viktimologi: Studi Kasus di Indonesia" (makalah pada Penataran Nasional Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi ke XI, Tahun 2005, Surabaya).
Muhaimin, M. 2019. Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(2), 185-206.
Rahardjo. 2003. Sisi-Sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kompas, hal 170.
Sihotang, P. H. (2020). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Menurut Peraturan Kapolri Dalam Mewujudkan Restorative Justice (Studi Di Polresta Deli Serdang). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 1(6), 107–120.