Ketidakadilan Pembinaan Terpidana berdasarkan Modalitas dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls

Main Article Content

Muhammad Liwa Ulham
Djuans Octaviano
Roy Satria Perdana
Muhammad Abelco

Abstract

It is truly extraordinary the phenomenon of legal injustice in our country, people no longer trust the existing law enforcement officers. The crisis of belief in legal justice is increasingly rampant along with the development of cases of petty theft by the poor who are subject to very strong legal pressure, but the law is weak for major cases that are detrimental to the state. To enforce the law today is a difficult thing. The law that is made cannot provide justice, certainty and benefits because the law is not really enforced. John Rawls argues to obtain the main goal of law, namely justice cannot be obtained by each individual. It is difficult to give fair law to people who can't afford it. Justice belongs only to the rulers. In order for the law to be fair, law enforcers in making decisions should not be rigid based only on articles in the law as a legal product but also look at the condition of society at that time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ulham, M. L., Djuans Octaviano, Roy Satria Perdana, & Muhammad Abelco. (2023). Ketidakadilan Pembinaan Terpidana berdasarkan Modalitas dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 1(01). Retrieved from https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/157
Section
Articles

References

b7428fd5403755d42143b004422f81e3481c6 @ business-law.binus.ac.id. (n.d.).

Anggara, S. (2016). Teori Keadilan John Rawls Kritik Terhadap Demokrasi Liberal. Jispo, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/jispo.v1i1.710

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006a). Negara Hukum Indonesia. L’école de Palo Alto, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14375/np.9782725625973

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006b). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta, 15.

b65d75b63d6c9b8a9a1b9d63fca36e8934327c76 @ jpicofmindonesia.org. (n.d.).

Fachruddin, A. (2019). Jurnalism Today. 11–31.

Faiz, P. M. (2017). Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls’ Theory of Justice). SSRN Electronic Journal, October. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847573

Fattah, D. (2014). Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls. Jurnal TAPIs, 9(2), 30–45.

Ii, B. A. B., & Modalitas, A. P. (2009). Bab 2-04204241019. 11–22.

index @ perpustakaan.kemendagri.go.id. (n.d.).

Jakarta, S. H. (2010). Keadilan sosial menurut john rawls.

Prawiro, W. (1979). Keadilan Sebagai Feirnes Menurut John Rawls.

Santoyo. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), 199–204.

Sudiro, A., & Keadilan, K. (1971). Ahmad Sudiro. Konsep Keadilan... 441.

Sunaryo, S. (2022). Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 001. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911

Wahyuni, D. F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. In Perpustakaan Nasional.

Widodo. (2017). Metodologi penelitian : populer & praktis (cetakan ke). Rajawali Pers.

Bernard L Tanya, Yoan N Simanjuntak, Markus Y Hage. 2010. Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publisihing.

Darji Darmo Diharjo, Shidarta. 2002. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum “Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia”. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Munir Fuadi. Dinamika Teori Hukum. 2007, Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta H.R.

Otje Salman S, Anton F Susanto. 2004. Teori Hukum . Bandung : PT Refika Adhitama.

Satjipto Rahardjo. Biarkan Hukum Mengenal Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum. Jakarta : PT Kompas Media Nusantara, 2007

Setyo Utomo. Sistem Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Pidana Yang Berbasid Restorative Justice. Majalah Hukum Nasional No 1 Tahun 2011

b7428fd5403755d42143b004422f81e3481c6 @ business-law.binus.ac.id. (n.d.).

Anggara, S. (2016). Teori Keadilan John Rawls Kritik Terhadap Demokrasi Liberal. Jispo, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/jispo.v1i1.710

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006a). Negara Hukum Indonesia. L’école de Palo Alto, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14375/np.9782725625973

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006b). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta, 15.

b65d75b63d6c9b8a9a1b9d63fca36e8934327c76 @ jpicofmindonesia.org. (n.d.).

Fachruddin, A. (2019). Jurnalism Today. 11–31.

Faiz, P. M. (2017). Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls’ Theory of Justice). SSRN Electronic Journal, October. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847573

Fattah, D. (2014). Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls. Jurnal TAPIs, 9(2), 30–45.

Ii, B. A. B., & Modalitas, A. P. (2009). Bab 2-04204241019. 11–22.

index @ perpustakaan.kemendagri.go.id. (n.d.).

Jakarta, S. H. (2010). Keadilan sosial menurut john rawls.

Prawiro, W. (1979). Keadilan Sebagai Feirnes Menurut John Rawls.

Santoyo. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), 199–204.

Sudiro, A., & Keadilan, K. (1971). Ahmad Sudiro. Konsep Keadilan... 441.

Sunaryo, S. (2022). Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 001. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911

Wahyuni, D. F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. In Perpustakaan Nasional.

Widodo. (2017). Metodologi penelitian : populer & praktis (cetakan ke). Rajawali Pers.