Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Pelanggaran Kode Etik Yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris yang Sedang Cuti
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the case of arrangements regarding the imposition of sanctions on Notaries who violate the code of ethics actually experience a legal vacuum, this is because there are no regulations that specifically regulate the responsibilities of notaries who are on leave but exercise their authority, even though their authority has been delegated to a Substitute Notary. Based on this description, the author aims to examine the legal consequences for the deed made by the notary who was made while on leave and to find out the sanctions given to the notary who made the deed during the leave period. The research specification that the writer uses is descriptive analysis. The approach method used by the author is normative juridical. while the analytical method used by the author is qualitative juridical. The results of the research that the authors get are the legal consequences for a deed made by a notary can be said to be valid as a deed, but the strength of the deed is only as an underhand deed made by someone who is on leave while exercising his authority as a state official as stipulated in Article 32 paragraph (1 ) Law Number 02 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. Sanctions given to a notary who makes a deed during the leave period are a written warning, temporary dismissal, honorable discharge, or dishonorable dismissal as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (2) of Law Number 02 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Laws Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Cahyono, I Gede Yudi Arsawan dan Akhmad Budi. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Klien Atas Pembuatan Akta Di Hadapan Notaris Pengganti Yang Tidak Sah.” Acta Komunitas Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 6, no. 3: 73.
Edwar .F, A. Rani dan Ali, D. 2019. “Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Ditinjau Dari Konsep Equality Before The Law.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 8, no. 2: 46.
Khisni, Estikharisma Harnum dan Akhmad. 2017. “Perbedaan Kewenangan Dan Syarat Tata Cara Pengangkatan Antara Notaris Dan Notaris Pengganti.” Jurnal Akta 4, no. 4: 169.
Laminto, G. C., & Nefi, A. (2022). PERAN, TANGGUNG JAWAB, DAN KEABSAHAN AKTA NOTARIS PENGGANTI DI BIDANG PASAR MODAL. PAKUAN LAW REVIEW, 8(1), 228-252.
Praptini, S. P., Kusriyah, S. K., & Witasari, A. (2019). Constitution and Constitutionalism of Indonesia. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2(1), 7-14.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Syafrudin, Ateng. 2000. “Menuju Penyekenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara yang Bersih dan Bertanggungjawab.” Jurnal Pro Justisia 1, no. 1: 43.
Shidarta, L. V. A. (2006). Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berfikir. PT Repika Aditama, Bandung.
Tobing, Yanti Jacline Jennier. 2010. “Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Jabatan dan Kode Etik Notaris.” Jurnal Media Hukum 2, no. 4: 23.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Undang-Undang Nomor 02 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Wisnuwardhani, Diah Aju. 2018. “Implementasi Hak Pekerja Dalam Hal Upah Di Kantor Notaris.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 8, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v8i1.1728.
Yuwono, I. D. (2011). Memahami berbagai etika profesi dan pekerjaan. MediaPressindo.